3 Compensation Budget Projections: Are They on Target?

By Juan Gonzalez, Axiom Consulting Partners

January 6, 2012

How are other employers thinking about investing in talent in 2012?

As a service to our clients and colleagues Axiom has aggregated 2012 compensation planning data from recent WorldatWork, the Conference Board, and Mercer Human Resources Consulting studies. The information includes projections for salary increase budgets, merit pay increase budgets, and salary structure movements for 2012. As this is early data, it is important to note that it is subject to change and that the actual salary increases are historically below early projections.

U.S. salary increase budgets remain relatively flat, as survey data has reported a projected median salary increase budgets of 3.0% for the past two consecutive years. Several compensation survey findings converge to the same conclusion that employers will place greater emphasis on allocating their salary budget increases towards merit pay, particularly for higher-performing employees.  As organizations face increased pressure to align their strategy, organization and talent, it is now more important than ever to link individual and team performance with key organizational objectives through improved goal setting and increased use of variable pay.

The table below provides a high-level overview of the 2011 actual and 2012 projected median salary budget increases from the three companies’ publicly available information. Subsequent pages aggregate more detailed information such as salary increase forecasts by location and employee category.

Source

Actual 2011 Median Salary Increase Budget

Projected 2012 Median Salary Increase Budget

Non-Exempt

Exempt Salaried

Executive

Non-Exempt

Exempt Salaried

Executive

WorldatWork[1]

3.0%

3.0%

3.0%

3.0%

3.0%

3.0%

The Conference Board[2]

3.0%

3.0%

3.0%

3.0%

3.0%

3.0%

Mercer[3]

2.7%

2.9%

 

 

WorldatWork

1 | Salary Increase Budgets

  • The median 2012 projected salary increase budget is 3.0% (includes companies that reported salary freezes) for all employee categories, showing no change from the actual median in 2011.
  • Salary increase budgets do not deviate significantly by metropolitan location. Additional location data is available.

1a | 2010 – 2012 Salary Increase Budgets

U.S. Employee Category

Actual 2010

Projected 2011

Actual 2011

Projected 2012

Mean

Median

Mean

Median

Mean

Median

Mean

Median

Non-exempt Hourly

2.4%

2.7%

2.9%

3.0%

2.7%

3.0%

2.9%

3.0%

Non-exempt Salaried

2.4%

2.7%

2.9%

3.0%

2.8%

3.0%

2.9%

3.0%

Exempt

2.5%

2.7%

2.9%

3.0%

2.8%

3.0%

2.9%

3.0%

Executive

2.5%

2.7%

3.0%

3.0%

2.8%

3.0%

2.9%

3.0%

                                                        

1b | Salary Increase Budgets by Location

 

Actual 2011

Projected 2012

Location

Mean

Median

Mean

Median

Atlanta

2.8%

3.0%

3.0%

3.0%

Boston

3.0%

3.0%

3.1%

3.0%

Chicago

2.9%

3.0%

3.0%

3.0%

Dallas

2.8%

3.0%

3.0%

3.0%

Houston

2.9%

3.0%

3.1%

3.0%

Los Angeles

2.8%

3.0%

3.0%

3.0%

New York

2.9%

3.0%

3.1%

3.0%

San Francisco

2.9%

3.0%

3.1%

3.0%

Washington D.C.

2.9%

3.0%

3.1%

3.0%

 

2 | Median Salary Structure Adjustments

  • The projected median salary structure movement is 2.0% for all employee categories for 2012.
  • Projected medians are the same as the 2011 actual and projected medians for all employee categories, with the exception of the actual 2011 median for executives (1.7%).  

 

 

2a | Salary Structure Movements

U.S.  Employee Category

Actual 2010

Projected 2011

Actual 2011

Projected 2012

Mean

Median

Mean

Median

Mean

Median

Mean

Median

Non-exempt Hourly

1.1%

0.8%

1.9%

2.0%

1.4%

2.0%

1.9%

2.0%

Non-exempt Salaried

1.3%

1.5%

2.0%

2.0%

1.5%

2.0%

1.9%

2.0%

Exempt

1.2%

1.0%

2.0%

2.0%

1.5%

2.0%

1.9%

2.0%

Executive

1.2%

0.0%

2.0%

2.0%

1.4%

1.7%

1.9%

2.0%

 

3 | Variable Pay

  • 2012 projected median variable pay budgets as a percent of total payroll vary by employee category and are as follows:
    • Non-exempt Hourly and Non-exempt Salaried Employees: 5.0%
    • Exempt Employees: 12.0%
    • Executives: 35.0%

 

  • 2012 median projections are equal to or greater than 2011 median projected percentage of paid variable pay, as well as 2011 projected percentage of budgeted variable pay.

3a | 2010 – 2012 Variable Pay Programs

U.S. Employee Category

2010

2011

2012

Average % Budgeted

Average % Paid

Average % Budgeted

Projected % Paid

Projected % Budgeted

Mean

Median

Mean

Median

Mean

Median

Mean

Median

Mean

Median

Non-exempt Hourly

5.3%

5.0%

5.1%

4.5%

5.2%

5.0%

5.0%

4.5%

5.4%

5.0%

Non-exempt Salaried

5.9%

5.0%

6.1%

5.0%

5.9%

5.0%

6.1%

5.0%

5.9%

5.0%

Exempt

12.4%

10.7%

12.6%

11.0%

12.5%

11.0%

12.8%

11.6%

12.7%

12.0%

Executive

36.0%

35.0%

39.0%

35.0%

36.5%

35.0%

38.3%

35.0%

36.5%

35.0%

                       

 

 

 

The Conference Board

1 | Salary Increase Budgets

  • The median 2012 projected salary increase budget is 3.0% for all employee categories (includes companies who reported salary freezes).
  • For each of the employee groups, median 2012 forecasts are the same as the actual 2011 increases, whereas the 25th and 75th percentiles of 2012 forecasts are slightly higher for each employee category.

1a | 2011 – 2012 Salary Increase Budgets by Employee Category

U.S. Employee Category

2011 Actual Salary Increase Budget

2012 Projected Salary Increase Budget

Median

25th Percentile

75th Percentile

Median

25th Percentile

75th Percentile

Non-exempt Hourly

3.0%

2.5%

3.2%

3.0%

3.0%

3.25%

Non-exempt Salaried

3.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.0%

2.8%

3.25%

Exempt

3.0%

2.5%

3.5%

3.0%

3.0%

3.5%

Executive

3.0%

2.5%

3.36%

3.0%

3.0%

3.5%

 

2 | Salary Structure Movements

  • Projections for 2012 salary structure movements are at a median of 2.0% for all employee groups, up from a projected median of 1.0% (non-exempt hourly, non-exempt salaried, exempt employees) and 0.0% (executives) in 2011. However, projected median salary structure movements are the same as 2011 actual salary structure movements for all employee categories.
  • The Conference Board cites current labor market conditions (a slack labor market with increased competition among workers for jobs) as one of main reasons salary structures are expected to see little movement again this year.

2a | 2011 – 2012 Salary Structure Movements by Employee Category

U.S. Employee Category

2011 Actual Increase

2012 Projected Increase

Median

25th Percentile

75th Percentile

Median

25th Percentile

75th Percentile

Non-exempt Hourly

2.0%

0.0%

2.2%

2.0%

1.5%

2.5%

Non-exempt Salaried

2.0%

0.0%

2.35%

2.0%

1.75%

2.5%

Exempt

2.0%

0.0%

2.30%

2.0%

1.5%

2.5%

Executive

2.0%

0.0%

2.30%

2.0%

1.5%

2.5%

3 | Merit Pay Increases

  • The actual median merit increase budget was 2.5% for all employee categories in 2010 and rose to 2.9% in 2011. The projected median merit increase budget for 2012 is 3.0%.
  • This upward trend in actual/projected merit increase budgets is indicative of the increasing prevalence of pay for performance compensation strategies amongst organizations.
  • In fact, while most companies have not budgeted for general increases, both the 2011 actual and 2012 projected overall Merit Pay Increase Budget percentages align with the Salary Increase Budgets.

 

Mercer

1 | Salary Increase Budgets

  • The Projected Salary Increase Budget for 2012 is 2.9%, up from an actual 2.7% in 2011 (includes companies that reported salary freezes).
  • Mercer notes that half the organizations that project higher 2012 pay increases than those granted in 2011 cited expected labor shortages and greater competition for workers as the main reasons.

1a | 2011 – 2012 Salary Increase Budgets by Employee Category

U.S. Employee Category

2011 Actual Salary Increase Budget

2012 Projected Salary Increase Budget

Average Increases (excluding 0s)

Average Increases (Including 0s)

Average Increases (excluding 0s)

Average Increases (Including 0s)

All Employees

2.9%

2.7%

3.0%

2.9%

Executives

3.0%

2.8%

3.0%

2.9%

Management

2.9%

2.7%

3.0%

2.9%

Professional

2.8%

2.7%

3.0%

2.9%

Office/clerical/technician

2.8%

2.7%

2.9%

2.9%

Trades/Production/Service

2.8%

2.7%

2.9%

2.8%

 

2 | Pay for Performance

  • As compensation budgets remain relatively flat, firms have reasonable concern that they may lose their top talent unless they adopt a pay for performance mentality and reward their top performers accordingly.
  • According to Mercer’s survey, the gap between high-performing employees and those in lower performance categories is widening significantly. In particular, Mercer notes the following:
    • The highest-performing employees (8% of the workforce) are expected to receive average base pay increases of 4.4%.
    • Average-performers (54% of the workforce) are expected to receive average base pay increases of just 2.8%.
    • The lowest performers (2% of the workforce) are expected to receive average base pay increases of just .4%.

 

Are those forecasts consistent with your organization's plans? Are any of the forecasts way off base?




[1] “The Salary Budget Survey.” Published July 5, 2011.

[2] “U.S. Salary Increase Budgets for 2012.” Published July 2011.

[3] “2011/2012 U.S. Compensation Planning Survey Report.” Published July 2011.

Add new comment